Startup claims world's first flying motorcycle, could go on sale next year for $60,000

zohaibahd

Posts: 756   +16
Staff
The big picture: Many startups are working on personal flying aircraft that you could park at your home and take off whenever needed, much like a car. But some are closer than others when it comes to delivering that vision – or at least they claim to be. One such company is Rictor, which unveiled its Skyrider X1 concept at CES 2025, billing it as the world's first flying motorcycle that could allow personal air travel as soon as next year.

The Skyrider X1 is essentially a hybrid between an electric moped and a quadcopter drone. It features two wheels for driving on roads and eight propellers providing stability while airborne. The vehicle is designed to fly at speeds up to 62 mph for up to 40 minutes on a single charge, depending on the battery size.

Renderings showcase an aggressive, angular body design with sleek lines, and a sporty ride stance when grounded. It appears to have a cabin capacity of a single person, much like a bike.

The Skyrider X1's biggest selling point is the promise of autonomous operation. According to Rictor, it will automatically plan optimal routes, adjusting for weather conditions, altitude, and airspeed as needed. Riders just need to input a destination, and the vehicle will get them there while avoiding obstacles and traffic on the ground. It can take off and land vertically on its own too.

If this all sounds too good to be true, that's because there are still massive technical and regulatory hurdles to overcome. Other air taxi companies like Joby Aviation and Volocopter have spent years trying to certify their piloted electric aircraft for simple airport routes, with little success so far. The idea of a self-flying personal vehicle zipping around populated areas seems exponentially more complex.

Even if Rictor does manage to get its product flight-ready, it's likely that autonomous flying will come much later, largely due to regulatory challenges. Thankfully, the X1 also offers manual control with joystick functionality.

Still, Rictor is insisting the Skyrider X1 will be a reality very soon – and with an unbelievably low $60,000 price tag. It even claimed that the vehicle was "the star exhibit of the show" on the floor in Las Vegas.

The startup is certainly talking a big game for an unproven company. Its only previous product is a traditional electric moped called the K1. But they assert that "robust innovation capabilities" are allowing them to spearhead new solutions for the masses.

Permalink to story:

 
People are doing so many stupid things on the roads. I imagine having those road “limitations” taken away… whatever used to be more or less a fender bender will have now pretty final consequences.
I hope flying cars never take off.

If everyone thought like this, we'd still be stuck with horse carriages. Thankfully, progress doesn’t wait for hesitation. You can hope all you want, but you can’t stop progress.
 
If I remember correctly all flying car concepts had 1 thing in common: they were bad cars ánd bad planes.
There's no doubt in my mind this contraption will be totally similar, IF it ever gets built (seems very unlikely).
Rictor may however succeed in convincing gullible investors to give them money - which is probably Plan #1.
 
People are doing so many stupid things on the roads. I imagine having those road “limitations” taken away… whatever used to be more or less a fender bender will have now pretty final consequences.
I hope flying cars never take off.
They will, by autonomous driving in approved airlanes. With interconnected air vehicles that prevents them from crashing and designated landing sites - This could easily be the transport of the future
 
They will, by autonomous driving in approved airlanes. With interconnected air vehicles that prevents them from crashing and designated landing sites - This could easily be the transport of the future
That’s probably the only way it is possible from a safety pov. But then again I’d rather have reliable ground based mass transit like light rail/ subway/ light commuter trains…
For me, going downtown TO on the weekends is much easier if I drive to the nearest GO station, park for free there, then take a train to Union.
 
Last edited:
If everyone thought like this, we'd still be stuck with horse carriages. Thankfully, progress doesn’t wait for hesitation. You can hope all you want, but you can’t stop progress
I cannot stop stupidity either, like people texting and driving.
I can only hope any personal flying thing will be fully autonomous and their use as tightly regulated as possible. Also regulation should be enforced as strictly possible.
 
So how close to my house/yard are drivers allowed to drive this thing? And what are my available recourse actions when they get too close?
 
If everyone thought like this, we'd still be stuck with horse carriages. Thankfully, progress doesn’t wait for hesitation. You can hope all you want, but you can’t stop progress.
Yeah, but there's progress, and then there's just stupid. Hopefully rational minds find the right middle ground. We make all-terrain vehicles, and bulldozers, that combined could probably get from most any suburban point A to point B in a straight line, but we're smart enough to not let people drive wherever they want including through people's yards. Similarly I don't want an aerial traffic lane 10 feet over my pool even if it is on the shortest path to the Starbucks or wherever else.
 
I would sure like one. I could tree top, avoid the highway and get straight to the back roads. Vroooom Vroooom
 
Very interesting comcept. The best thing about it is that is is a typical motorcycle that can go places. I think that it needs protective casing for the blades when those are deactivated, though.
 
It's just as valid to call it a foldable electric gyrocopter with bicycle landing gear.
Marketing is all about perspective.
 
They will, by autonomous driving in approved airlanes. With interconnected air vehicles that prevents them from crashing and designated landing sites - This could easily be the transport of the future
Oh.........I do love an optimist....................
 
They will, by autonomous driving in approved airlanes. With interconnected air vehicles that prevents them from crashing and designated landing sites - This could easily be the transport of the future
They could also use virtual designated airways created with safety and avoidance of densely populated areas in mind.
Say there is a strip of trees along freeway, they can fly above it making their crashes safe for other people. When they pass big cities, they would be limited to move over freeways and only land at the landing places.
I agree that with many of these, automation will become mandatory. I feel like they would behave very similarly to trains, that is, they will not free roam but go from point A to point B. Their software would not let them to go into red zones, which I assume most areas with people will be.
With this in mind, I doubt in the bright future of these devices. The more of them are allowed to fly, the more limits there will be. And if one of these falls and kills a couple of people, everyone will demand more limits.
They seem like an easier access to flying compared to planes, but I do not think that in developed countries those strict regulations can bypass these flying things.
 
Changing from petrol to EV. Stupid.
Flying cars. Stupid.
Flying bikes. Stupid.
For every 3rd and upwards child born a new house, and car, resources used increases.
So more cars and houses means roads packed.
Ah do the math.
Build better more economic ecological towns and infrastructure. Start again. Or just polish your turd towns until you choke to death.
The fact these ideas are just so dumb makes me think there is 0 hope for a decent future.

Flying bike, $60,000.
Watching someone fall out the sky into a fireball, priceless.
For everything else there is MasterCard.
Remember them ads. Lol

 
They will, by autonomous driving in approved airlanes. With interconnected air vehicles that prevents them from crashing and designated landing sites - This could easily be the transport of the future
There's already rules in place for "experimental aircraft" etc. I have a paramotor which is like a paraglider combined with a camp chair and with a motorbike engine and propellor on the back. It's about as safe as it sounds. The rules here in the UK state you have to keep 500 feet away from people and structures and not fly over built up areas. I didn't go near designated air lanes because I flew at 30mph and planes tend to fly at 200mph+.

The reason these things will never be transport of the future is that most people, for some strange reason, are very risk adverse.
 
There's already rules in place for "experimental aircraft" etc. I have a paramotor which is like a paraglider combined with a camp chair and with a motorbike engine and propellor on the back. It's about as safe as it sounds. The rules here in the UK state you have to keep 500 feet away from people and structures and not fly over built up areas. I didn't go near designated air lanes because I flew at 30mph and planes tend to fly at 200mph+.

The reason these things will never be transport of the future is that most people, for some strange reason, are very risk adverse.
Well, I’m thinking more in the line of «air rodes» made by GPS fencing. Basically you could have a gps road where direction A flies 15 meters above ground, direction B flies 25m above ground etc. The upside of this mode of transportation would be a close to 0 cost of road upkeep - «roads» could go over farmland as long the vehicles are electrical and they could go in much straighter lines + over water with no bridges - meaning shorter distances and more access to destinations you’d usually need a ferry to go to. As long as they’re autonomous it would also mean less accidents when they perfect the builds and durability.
Downside would be strong winds/heavy rain would probably affect them to a much higher degree than regular cars.
 
As long as they’re autonomous it would also mean less accidents when they perfect the builds and durability.
Downside would be strong winds/heavy rain would probably affect them to a much higher degree than regular cars.
There are definite advantages but the potential issues can have dire consequences. Think of congestion on those lanes, any malfunction in one of those “upper” lanes would spread disaster in the lower lanes and on the ground. Imagine the average Joe who thinks he can fix his own car or jailbreak its software with instructions from TikTok, because freedom man!!!
There’s potential for accidents, mistakes and (unfortunately) misuse in any technology, new or old and history tells us that no amount of safeguarding will make everything completely safe. That in itself should not stop us from adopting new technologies but should better inform us and perhaps in some cases temper our enthusiasm.
 
Back