Quantum computing stocks tumble after Nvidia CEO says "very useful" quantum computers are 20 years away

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,541   +196
Staff member
In brief: Recent comments by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang triggered several stocks tied to quantum computing companies to tumble in value this week. During a Q/A session with investors at CES on Tuesday, Huang said useful quantum computers are likely around two decades away.

Addressing a question from an audience member, Huang said 15 years would probably be on the "early side" and that 30 years would likely be on the late side. "But if you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it," he added.

Huang's comments hit quantum computing companies swiftly and sharply. As of writing, share value in D-Wave Quantum is down 43.8 percent. Rigetti Computing saw its stock dip more than 39 percent. Shares in IonQ, a quantum computing software and hardware company based out of Maryland, are down more than 40 percent. Quantum Computing Inc., which trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol QUBT, is down over 44 percent as of writing.

Also read: What is Quantum Computing?

According to Reuters, the four companies are set to lose more than $5 billion in market value. Thomas Hayes, chairman of Great Hill Capital, told the publication that any dollar chasing quantum computing stocks is not chasing AI stocks.

"Jensen threw a wet blanket on the quantum story and did everything he could to sell the AI story. It's that simple," Hayes added.

Given Nvidia's position as a dominant player in the artificial intelligence industry, it's no surprise that some would draw such conclusions from Huang's comments. But it may not be as clear cut as that.

As Huang highlighted just moments before, in the case of quantum computers, you also need classical computers to perform error correction – and they better be the fastest computer that humanity can build. "And that happens to be us," he added.

According to Huang, just about every quantum computing company in the world is working with Nvidia now. Regardless of whether useful quantum happens sooner or later, it seems Nvidia is in position to take advantage of it either way. In the meantime, it's got AI to tend to.

As for Nvidia, its stock is up a little over three percent YTD after gaining nearly 170 percent over the past year and a staggering 2,200 percent over the last five years.

Permalink to story:

 
Kudos to Huang for unmasking one of the ugliest technology scam in history.
I would not call it a scam, it is real, prototypes are available.
But I agree with him is that distance to practical application is not near.
Look how many amazing things we created in the last 20 years.
But just like fusion reactors, we are still waiting on usable quantum computers.
 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang triggered several stocks tied to quantum computing companies to tumble in value this week

But of course he did...this way, next week he can go out & buy them up for pennies on the dollar, saving himself & the company a gazillion $$ in the process, so they can snatch up all their tech/innovations & use them for his own enrichment....

go figure....

nGreediya..the way companies & consumers are played !
 
But of course he did...this way, next week he can go out & buy them up for pennies on the dollar, saving himself & the company a gazillion $$ in the process, so they can snatch up all their tech/innovations & use them for his own enrichment....

go figure....

nGreediya..the way companies & consumers are played !
Can't wait for your update next week!
 
"Recent comments by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang triggered several stocks tied to quantum computing companies to tumble in value this week."

Whereupon he promptly ordered one of his minions to pick up a few billion-dollars-worth of aforementioned stocks.... (What do they call the opposite of "pump and dump" ?)
 
Rather a hype. It will ultimately be achievable. Though I assume this will take several decades.
Dont be so sure. There are plenty of promised tech that would revolutionize the field and by implication the world, but after the news, nobody ever heard anything about it. If we also take into account that people have very short attention span it make sense why so many throw those news so easily.

These news dont mean anything in the real world, only in the imaginary ones, aka for the gullible, to keep them feed that the higher ups are working and caring for them.
 
"every quantum company is working with nVidia right now" + "Jensen instantly wipes billions off their value" = nVidia then goes on a bargain-bin shopping spree to bring those mysteriously devalued companies under the Team Green umbrella. How convenient.

Those companies should now be more determined than ever to get something useful to market and prove him wrong while resisting takeover advances.
 
"X is Y years away ..."

Prophecies of that type are entirely meaningless. Just 3 years ago, AGI was considered 20-30 years away even by the people behind today's frontier models. Jensen's opinion is just another opinion, it's ridiculous that it had such effect.
 
"Recent comments by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang triggered several stocks tied to quantum computing companies to tumble in value this week."

Whereupon he promptly ordered one of his minions to pick up a few billion-dollars-worth of aforementioned stocks.... (What do they call the opposite of "pump and dump" ?)
Deny & Buy
 
It's not going to happen. It's nothing the world wants, and hypothetical technology that the world doesn't want or need doesn't make it. That's an underlying principle that's actually stronger than any hypothetical principle put forth to justify pursuit of a technology.

Are there flying cars (which have been worked on for decades)? "Yes" (as a curiosity) but "no" as far as anything that proliferates or ever will proliferate, because a world full of flying cars would be a chaotic nightmare where privacy-annihilating trespass and uncontrollable traffic would reign supreme.

Quantum computers (so it is hyped) would render cryptography useless, so welcome to a world of exposed financial transactions that would be heaven for criminality. And of course there's the justifications that are always used to try to communicate to the public why the technology you are working on is a boon and a blessing to humanity -- new drugs (such new creations always turn out to be as dangerous and ineffective as the old ones) and new weapons to protect ourselves from the terrible evil 'enemies' we are always encouraged to fear by the contractor-dominated establishment.

No technology exists for its own sake. If a tech is bad, its actual use will not proliferate in the world.
 
Back